1000 Deaths in My Name
Posted in Americana on December 2nd, 2005 by ДмитрийI’ve always been iffy about the death penalty. On one hand, I don’t think that the state should kill people as official policy, outside the execution of war. On the other hand, I admit my own desire for retribution should violent crime visit my life…
The problem with the death penalty is that it’s permanent. “Beyond a shadow of a doubt” rings hollow if even a single person is falsely punished. It obviously does not work as a deterrent, since America has the highest murder rate of any country in the world (outside countries dealing with such things as domestic war and terrorism, such as Congo and Israel and Indonesia).
That only leaves retribution. But if we truly wanted retribution, then the death penalty is surely not serving its purpose. If someone killed my loved one, I would not want the state to kill them humanely after 10 years in prison. I would want to hunt them like an animal and kill them myself. In the case of serial killers and mass murderers, the only answer would be to torture them endlessly; to make them feel the pain of death over and over again. I doubt the current laws give much satisfaction to the families of any victims. In order to give such satisfaction, we’d have to give the state too much violent authority.
I am not willing to cede such rights and abilities to my government. I fear my government enough already as it is. This is why, despite my often harsh take on politics and moral affairs, the death penalty is something I cannot support, morally, personally or philosophically.
Most comprehensive studies of average US states (eg, excluding places like Texas that execute people before they’ve even committed the crime, etc) show about equal costs between life in prison with one or two appeals and the average 10 years on death row with dozens of appeals and special court action. In the case of more cautious and wishy-washy states like California and Washington, I’ve even seen arguments that the death penalty is more expensive for taxpayers. So the economic argument doesn’t really wash with me.
The death penalty in America is a political chess piece. Politicians use it as a litmus test to obtain popular support. The masses are always screaming for blood - they care not who bleeds. Look at Rome; look at Nazi Germany.